Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Criminal’ Category

Read Full Post »

Trump

                                         WTF GOP
Racist, Sexist, Xenophobic Demagogue Wins NH…

By Ryan Grim Washington Bureau Chief, The Huffington Post, and Igor Bobic Associate Politics Editor, The Huffington Post.

Editor’s note: Donald Trump is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist, birther and bully who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S.

 

I am outraged by the headline news above, published on February 10, 2016, right after the New Hampshire Primary results.

I myself have studied Journalism, and it is clear to me that The Huffington Post has blatantly thrown away the ethics book in regards to its Journalistic reporting.  My Journalism Professor constantly reminded us that a reporter’s job is to report, Who, What, Where, When, and Why, simple as that, and the reporting must not include “opinion”.

The headline above is offensive, unprofessional, and shows opinion from the writers/editors. In my opinion, Mr. Grim, and Mr. Bobic, have failed miserably as journalists, and the Editor’s note, is begging for Mr. Trump to file a Libel suit against the publisher!

I have compiled some information on the ethics of Journalism, and can only hope that journalistic reporting will change to what it is supposed to be, that of reporting the facts and the truth.

Legal Responsibility:

Any libelous or defamatory presentation ………, is not permittable and should strictly be avoided by the journalist.

Professional Responsibility:  A journalist should have sincerity and commitment towards its profession.

The presentation must be truthful and unbiased above all and shall never bring any embarrassment or complicity to the organization.

Guiding Principles:

Journalism’s obligation is to the public. Journalism places the public’s interests ahead of commercial, political and personal interests. Journalism empowers viewers, listeners and readers to make more informed decisions for themselves; it does not tell people what to believe or how to feel.

Ethical decision-making should occur at every step of the journalistic process, including story selection, news-gathering, production, presentation and delivery.

The really sad thing is all the major news media outlets only report opinions, and get away with slanderous writings that do nothing but confuse the readers. Sadly, it is reflective of the corrupt political system that is in place at this time also.

More than ever, the public, and citizens must do their own research to find the truth regarding News and Information today. Unfortunately, there is too much opinion that is being reported as truth. As they state in Marketing, “Buyer Beware”! (Caveat Emptor)

Trisho

Responsibility In Journalism.
February 13, 2009 by Pranab Hazra – University of Southern California
http://www.ojr.org/p1648/

RTDNA Code of Ethics (Radio Television Digital News Association)
http://www.rtdna.org/content/rtdna_code_of_ethics

Read Full Post »

From: Hillbuzz.org

Why is this not already on the books in every state?

The Constitution has specific requirements about who can be elected President of the United States, but does not provide for any mechanism to ensure these requirements are met.
It has always been assumed no one would run for president without actually being eligible to hold the office.
The problem is, there’s no agency in place to ask for that documentation, and no procedure for making sure those documents are valid.

This is definitely an interesting development in the political arena.  I’m wondering, if it is determined that Obama was NOT eligible to be President, what happens to all his policies he passed? Will be go to jail? What about all the people who aided his rise to the presidency? Like Pelosi?

I hope someone who is knowledgeable about this will comment. Any thoughts?

To read more: World net Daily

Read Full Post »

As the Democrats realize they will probably lose many seats this November with the mid-term elections, they are utilizing all means of corruption as a last attempt to save themselves. I said before, as I am stating now, they will stop at nothing to keep their power.

The following is from the Houston Chronicle, reporting that yes, it is business as usual for the Democrats. Another “Acorn type” organization here in Texas, called “Houston Votes”, has submitted bogus votes and yes, even non-citizen votes to aid their candidates.

This is only part of the article, to read the whole story:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/7170826.html

Harris County Tax Assessor Collector Leo Vasquez accused a nonprofit group of submitting thousands of bogus voter registration applications in recent months in what he said appears to be a campaign to taint the voter rolls.

Vasquez said his office has received thousands of duplicate applications, including cases in which the office has received six applications for the same person. Other irregularities he cited in the more than 25,000 applications submitted by Houston Votes include cases of underage applicants and people who identified themselves as non-citizens.

Tax Assessor-Collector & Voter Registrar Harris County Tax Office

“The integrity of the voter roll of Harris County, Texas, appears to be under an organized and systematic attack by the group operating under the name Houston Votes,” Vasquez said.

The group is the voter registration arm of Texans Together, which works to increase civic participation in low-income neighborhoods.

QUESTIONABLE APPLICATIONS

Among the findings by voter registration officials who reviewed 25,640 applications submitted by Houston Votes:

• 7,193 resulted in new voters.

• Another 10,500 are presumed legitimate, but are being checked at the Secretary of State’s office for name and address changes.

• 1,597 different people applied to vote at least twice.

• 325 applications were from underage applicants.

• 25 applications were from people who identified themselves as non-citizens.

• 1,014 applications were from people who already were voters.

• 3,531 applications were rejected because the information in their applications did not match their driver’s license or Social Security numbers.

Source: Harris County Tax Office

The Board of Directors, they are a group of liberal activist lawyers, where several list their past accomplishments as “Community Organizers”, just like Obama was.

Read Full Post »

forward:

I really hate to get involved in politics, but enough is enough.  It is time to take back our country, as it is being raped over and over by the current administration.  The Constitution is blatantly ignored as Obama and his followers finagle ways to implement his “agenda” by bypassing Congress.

I’m really getting tired of hearing something new every day that he is trying to do to this country.  The latest?  bypassing Congress to let illegals stay in the U.S.  You can read about that here:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/24/source-administration-weighing-unilateral-legalization-illegal-immigrants/

If Obama keeps pushing the “people”, I’m afraid there will be yet another “Bastille Day”….only this one won’t be in France….and yes, heads will roll.

Back to what needs to be addressed NOW…….

John Harris, Blagojevich’s former chief of staff, testified in the ex-governor’s corruption trial in Federal District Court this week that Barack Obama knew of Blagojevich’s plan to “sell” the Illinois senate seat that would be left vacant by Obama.

Blagojevich’s lawyers tried to subpoena Obama earlier this year but presiding Judge James B. Zagel refused to allow it. Other White House aides, including Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, have been subpoenaed.

June 14: Former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich arrives for his trial. AFP/Getty Images

Is Barack Hussein Obama above the law? I don’t think so, but apparently Judge Zagel believes he is.

This calls for action, and just blogging about it won’t change anything.  But, you may contact Mr. Zagel, and express your opinion about this to him.  I have already contacted his office, and here is his contact information:

U.S. District Court

Northern District of Illinois

Judge James B. Zagel

Courtroom: 2503

Chambers: 2588

Chambers phone# 312-435-5713

Fax: 312-544-8521

There is power in numbers!  Speak your voice and be heard!

To read the complete story: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/25/obama-knew-blagojevich-plot-aide-says/?test=latestnews

p.s. he he….J’aime la photo du roi Louis-Obama, c’est très drôle.

Read Full Post »

I had heard recently that there is STILL OIL on Alaska’s beaches from the Exxon Valdez spill that happened twenty one years ago. So I decided to do some research and found this interview from “Democracy Now”, a daily TV/radio news program, hosted by Amy Goodman. The following is just part of an interview she had with Riki Ott, a community activist, marine toxicologist, and former commercial salmon fisher-woman and author of two books on the spill.

The reason I feel this interview is important to share with the masses is because of the issue of “corporations” having the same rights as a person. (being protected by law). She explains this in detail later, and I encourage you to think of what power is being given to corporations, and as long as they continue to have these same rights, justice will never be “for the people”.

Now with the oil spill off the coast of Louisiana, we will face yet many more years of litigation, which will of course not accomplish justice for the people, or animals that are now suffering (and will continue to suffer) because of this tragedy.

To read the complete interview, you may use this link:

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/3/24/20_years_after_exxon_valdez_oil

AMY GOODMAN:

A report marking the twentieth anniversary of the spill has found oil still persists in the region and, in some places, quote, “is nearly as toxic as it was a few weeks after the spill.” The report was put together by the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council, which oversaw restoration efforts. It states, quote, “At this rate, the remaining oil will take decades and possibly centuries to disappear entirely.”

RIKI OTT:

Those ecosystem studies began in 1994, really too late for our trial. They didn’t get completed until about 2004—I’m talking about published papers now. And those studies show, sure enough, the oil that’s remaining on our beaches is still causing harm

AMY GOODMAN: Let me see. You have brought a little jar. This is Exxon Valdez oil, Smith Island, Prince William Sound. This is one year ago. This is not from—

RIKI OTT: This is July 2nd last year, not even a year.

AMY GOODMAN: This is astounding.

RIKI OTT: That’s what we think, too. I take children out on the beaches now who were born after the spill and say, “This is your legacy.”

AMY GOODMAN: It’s just covered in oil.

RIKI OTT: The oil specifically is polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, PAHs. This is actually coming out the tailpipes of our automobiles. It’s the fine soot. That’s kind of the codeword for it. And this is linked with genetic harm, not only in animals, but in people, as well, respiratory harm, reproductive impairment, cancers. Very low levels of this oil, these PAHs, cause incredible harm to people.

AMY GOODMAN: You’ve said that is not just an environmental disaster, but a crisis in democracy.

RIKI OTT: It is a democracy crisis. The question we started asking as our lawsuit went on and on and on, and we didn’t get paid, was how did corporations get this big, where they can manipulate the legal system, the political system? What happened here? And I thought that was a really good question, so I went to answer it. And that became the final chapter of Not One Drop.

And I learned from other people’s work that there’s actually two ways to amend the Constitution. One is formally, through people-made law, which we’ve done twenty-seven times. And one is informally, through what Thomas Jefferson called the engine of consolidation, the federal judiciary, the Supreme Court.

And in 1886, the Supreme Court made sort of a seminal decision, where it granted a railroad corporation equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment, which is, of course, a civil rights amendment for due process and equal protection for African American men. For the first forty years after that passed, there were 307 lawsuits brought, nineteen by African American men, the rest by corporations.

And at that point, when the Fourteenth Amendment passed to corporations, this thing called a corporate person arose. And that corporate person, in the eyes of the law, is able to access our rights, human rights, the Bill of Rights, constitutional protections. This is wrong. The word “corporation” never appears in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. This is how we’ve lost freedom of speech. We still—we, as people, still have the First Amendment, but so do corporations. Free speech equals money. Those with more money have more speech. Pretty simple. So I began to understand that the legal system is broken. The election process is broken, all because of the same reason, this corporate personhood.

AMY GOODMAN: Riki Ott, I want to thank you for being with us. She has written the book Not One Drop: Betrayal and Courage in the Wake of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. I thank you for joining us.

RIKI OTT: Thank you. And I’m advocating the Twenty-Eighth Amendment to strip corporations of human rights. Thank you.

Gray Whale photo: (John Gaps III / AP)

Worker photo: latimesblogs.latimes.com/…/03/09/valdez.jpg


Read Full Post »

Congressman Darrell Issa (R) of California, released a report yesterday showing a link between Acorn, the Labor Union SEIU, and Barak Obama.

Why is this news?  Well, it reveals a criminal conspiracy.  Why is that?  Well, it is ok for Labor Unions to be involved and have an affect on elections, BUT it is NOT ok for labor unions to conspire with non-profits to change the outcome of an election in favor of the democrat of their choice.   This report claims the SEIU and Acorn had agreements between them.  It is NOT ok to use charity money, bank money, and Federal Government money that is intended to do community development work, but instead use it to change the outcome of an election.  This is simply prohibited.

Will anything be done about this?  Will there be consequences for Obama?  Will  main-stream media even report about this newly released information?

To read the complete report, please copy and paste this link into your browser:

http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/images/stories/Reports/20100218followthemoneyacornseiuandtheirpoliticalallies.pdf

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: